2008 Election Contest for the 11th District Bench Mark Davidson vs. Mike Miller Judge Mark Davidson was unopposed in the Republican primary, but faced a Democratic opponent in the general election. Davidson sought to distinguish himself in the reelection campaign from his fellow Republican incumbents and even sported endorsements by Democrats on his campaign website, but it did not appear to make a difference. Davidson was swept out along with most Harris County incumbent Republican judges. Attorney Mike Miller, sole candidate in the Democratic Party's primary garnered a comfortable majority of the vote. Miller is a long-time trial lawyer who knows both sides of the docket and promised judicial restraint and dignified treatment of lawyers and litigants. Davidson continues on as a appointed judge of a special court for asbestos litigation. |
|
Mike Miller Succeeds Mark Davidson as Judge of the 11th District Court in Harris County, Texas Houston Opinions |
Aug. 10, 2009: High-profile defamation suit stemming from steroid-pushing allegations against gym owner lands in Judge Miller's court: Kelly Blair v. Michael O'Keeffe, et al; In the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas, Cause No. 2009- 50671(defamation of character by journalists and book publisher alleged) APPEALS FROM JUDGE MIKE MILLER'S COURT In Re Continental Airlines, Inc. (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 4, 2010)(Seymore) (mandamus relief granted to quash apex disposition) The trial court abused its discretion by compelling the apex deposition of Larry Kellner. Accordingly, we conditionally grant Continental’s petition and direct the trial court to set aside its October 26, 2009 order compelling Kellner’s deposition. MOTION OR WRIT GRANTED: Opinion by Justice Seymore Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Seymore and Sullivan 14-09-00952-CV In Re Continental Airlines, Inc. Appeal from 11th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Mike Miller In re Texas Tri-Care Rehabilitation (pdf) (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 22, 2010)(per curiam) (discovery mandamus denied re: order compelling responses to certain requests for production) DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Per Curiam Before Justices Keyes, Alcala and Hanks 01-10-00003-CV In re Texas Tri-Care Rehabilitation and Lawrence Roddick, D.C. Appeal from 11th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Mike Miller In Re Fabian (Tex.App. - Houston [1st Dist.] Jul. 14, 2009)(per curiam) DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Per Curiam Before Justices Keyes, Hanks and Bland 01-09-00557-CV In re Maria E. Fabian Appeal from 11th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Mike Miller Trial Court Case #: 0910152\ PER CURIAM OPINION Relator, Maria E. Fabian, seeks mandamus relief to compel the trial court to vacate its June 15, 2009 order denying her motion to show authority.1 On July 2, 2009, Fabian moved to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and accompanying motion for emergency relief. We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and accompanying motion for emergency relief. PER CURIAM The underlying lawsuit is Mayra Enereida Ibarra-Garcia v. United Parcel Services Inc., Cause Number 2009-10152, in the 11th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Miller, presiding. In re Pernia (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Jun. 25, 2009)(per curiam denial) DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Per Curiam Panel members: Chief Justice Radack, Justices Taft and Sharp 01-09-00295-CV In re Sherman D. Pernia Appeal from 11th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Mike Miller Trial Court Case #: 0815502 MEMORANDUM OPINION By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Sherman D. Pernia, challenges the trial court's[Fn1] May 6, 2009, order compelling arbitration. On April 20, 2009, the Court abated the above-referenced original proceeding to allow the Honorable Mike Miller, who succeeded the Honorable Mark Davidson, former judge of the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas, to reconsider Judge Davidson’s order, dated December 30, 2008, compelling arbitration. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b) (“If the case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate the proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.”). On May 26, 2009, relator filed with this Court a copy of Judge Miller’s order, in which he, too, compelled arbitration. Accordingly, we reinstate the above-referenced original proceeding on the Court’s active docket. We deny relator’s motion for temporary stay of arbitration. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Taft [Fn2] Fn1: The underlying case is Sherman D. Pernia v. Mark B. Anderson., No. 2008-15502, in the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Mike Miller, presiding. Fn2: The Honorable Tim Taft, retired justice, Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, participating by assignment. |