In Re Van Dyke (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Jul. 28, 2009)(per curiam denial)
(mandamus re:
nunc pro tunc judgment denied) (mandate, subsequent appeals)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Per Curiam    
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Brock Yates and Guzman)
14-09-00556-CV        In Re Scott Van Dyke   
Appeal from 133rd District Court of Harris County
Trial Court Judge:
Hon. Jaclanel McFarland

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________

NO. 14-09-00556-CV
____________

IN RE SCOTT VAN DYKE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On June 23, 2009, relator, Scott Van Dyke, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex.
Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asks this
court to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, presiding judge of the 133rd District Court of Harris
County, to vacate her May 4, 2009 order denying his motion for entry of judgment nunc pro tunc and her
June 22, 2009 order denying his motion for entry of judgment in accordance with this court's opinion.

Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus.  Accordingly,
we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus and lift the stay issued on June 24, 2009.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Guzman.